Критерії оцінювання професійної іншомовної компетентності в проблемно-орієнтованому навчанні
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Вінниця : ВДПУ
Abstract
Автор статті дослідив оцінювання професійної іншомовної компетентності студентів у проблемно-орієнтовному навчанні (ПОН) та запропонував певні критерії для його здійснення. У проблемно-орієнтованому навчанні оцінювання зазвичай є комплексним та складається з оцінок викладача, одногрупників і самооцінки. Проте дослідження виявило недостатній рівень сформованості навичок самооцінювання та взаємооцінювання студентів, котрі часто відчували певний дискомфорт, оцінюючи одногрупників і самих себе. У своєму дослідженні автор виокремив певні критерії оцінювання професійної іншомовної компетентності в проблемно-орієнтованому навчанні.
The author of the article investigates the means of assessing foreign language proficiency in PBL and yields its criteria. Being complex, assessment in PBL frequently includes peer assessment and self-assessment, alongside tutors’ evaluation. The study has revealed students’ low peer and self-assessment literacy. They often reported feeling embarrassed while assessing their fellows. The participants were not psychologically ready for uttering and listening to any critical ideas, and receiving tutors’ feedback seemed more natural and anticipated for them. Being able to evaluate the process of gaining knowledge and to reflect on the results of their learning is considered a key element in PBL and life-long education. However, the research demonstrated a low level of students’ knowledge about the ways of peer review and self-assessment, and the absence of necessary skills. The aim of the article was to investigate the available means of assessment in PBL, define the most efficient ones, and offer some criteria which can be used for evaluating foreign language proficiency in PBL. According to the research, the formative assessment fits the philosophy of PBL. Among the suggested criteria we can mention the language (native or foreign) used for the information search, its presenting, discussing at the problem-solving phase; communicative skills; plagiarism; interaction with other participants, general or specialized English vocabulary used during the discussion. The author stresses that assessment criteria must be explained and clarified before implementing PBL for developing students’ foreign language proficiency as students should be aware from the very beginning who assesses them, and what they are assessed for.
The author of the article investigates the means of assessing foreign language proficiency in PBL and yields its criteria. Being complex, assessment in PBL frequently includes peer assessment and self-assessment, alongside tutors’ evaluation. The study has revealed students’ low peer and self-assessment literacy. They often reported feeling embarrassed while assessing their fellows. The participants were not psychologically ready for uttering and listening to any critical ideas, and receiving tutors’ feedback seemed more natural and anticipated for them. Being able to evaluate the process of gaining knowledge and to reflect on the results of their learning is considered a key element in PBL and life-long education. However, the research demonstrated a low level of students’ knowledge about the ways of peer review and self-assessment, and the absence of necessary skills. The aim of the article was to investigate the available means of assessment in PBL, define the most efficient ones, and offer some criteria which can be used for evaluating foreign language proficiency in PBL. According to the research, the formative assessment fits the philosophy of PBL. Among the suggested criteria we can mention the language (native or foreign) used for the information search, its presenting, discussing at the problem-solving phase; communicative skills; plagiarism; interaction with other participants, general or specialized English vocabulary used during the discussion. The author stresses that assessment criteria must be explained and clarified before implementing PBL for developing students’ foreign language proficiency as students should be aware from the very beginning who assesses them, and what they are assessed for.
Description
Освіта. Професійна освіта
Keywords
проблемно-орієнтоване навчання (ПОН), професійна іншомовна компетентність; формуюче оцінювання, зворотній зв’язок, взаємооцінювання, самооцінювання, problem-based learning, foreign language proficiency, assessment, formative assessment, feedback, peer assessment, self-assessment
Citation
Будас Ю. О. Критерії оцінювання професійної іншомовної компетентності в проблемно-орієнтованому навчанні / Ю. О. Будас // Наукові записки. Серія: Педагогіка і психологія : зб. наук. праць / Вінницький державний педагогічний університет імені Михайла Коцюбинського. – Вінниця, 2020. – Випуск 63. – С. 63-68.