Богатько, В. В.Bogatko, V. V.2017-11-102017-11-102017Богатько В. В. Особливості функціонування складнопідрядних речень зі з’ясувальною підрядною частиною в мовотворчості Михайла Стельмаха / Валентина Богатько // Наукові записки Вінницького державного педагогічного університету імені Михайла Коцюбинського. Серія: Філологія (мовознавство) : збірник наукових праць / [гол. ред. І. Я. Завальнюк]. – Вінниця : Планер, 2017. – Вип. 24. – С. 122-129https://library.vspu.net/items/0f437181-e51b-4b20-aa19-b284be4b1cf1У статті проаналізовано складнопідрядні речення зі з’ясувальною підрядною частиною, визначено можливий порядок розташування предикативної частини, її граматичні особливості, характер синтаксичного зв’язку між головною та підрядною частинами, засоби вираження цього зв’язку, а також звернено увагу на семантику дієслівних предикатів складнопідрядних речень з’ясувального типу.В статье проанализированы сложноподчиненные предложения с изъяснительной подчинительной связью, определен возможный порядок расположения предикативной части, ее грамматические особенности, характер синтаксической связи между главной и подчинительной частями, средства выражения этой связи, а также обращено внимание на семантику глагольных предикатов сложноподчиненных предложений изъяснительного типа.The article analyzes the complex sentences with an exploratory contracting part in the Mykhailo Stelmakh’s linguistics. It is payed attentiont at the fact that the system of complex sentences in the M. Stelmakh’s linguistics is the complex phenomenon, which is based on a variety of types of constructions, among which separated complex sentances with an exploratory contracting part. he complex sentances with an exploratory contracting part Sophisticated sentences in the in the M. Stelmakh’s linguistics pass a complete semantic and grammatical, emotional and stylistic selection. It is proved that in the organization of the internal-syntactic structure of the complex sentence as a communicative unit, such language means, as subordinate conjunctions and connecting words, play an important role. It is noted that they are the defining feature of a complex sentence. It is indicated that such conjunctions and connectives means grammatically subordinate one part of the complex sentence to another and to a large extent determine the specificity of the semantic-grammatical dependence of the subordinate sentence from the principal. It was discovered that the author preferred an unsemantic conjugation to design structures of an exploratory type. Unsemantic connectives means have semantic-grammatical function, in addition to the syntactic, and as a result the semantic role of the leading verb-predicate decreases. The conjunction “that” is the main unsemantic conjunction of complex sentances with an exploratory contracting part. According to our observations, it was found that in the complex sentences with an exploratory contracting part the conjunction “as” and “in order to” are implemented to a lesser extent. The conjunction “as” is less used than “in order to”. It presents the refinement and identification of the content of predicates in the aspect of the statement with an undertone of qualitative and circumstantial meaning, it is used when the determination of action or state is accompanied by a characteristic, the attention is focused on the way of their manifestation. The constructive possibilities of the conjunction “as” are rather limited: it joins the contracting part with the reference word on the notation of perception, feeling, thinking with the main sentence. The main unsemantic conjunctive words that are used by M. Stelmakh are “that” and “which”. A onjunctive word “that” exhibits polysemicity in relation to its functions and prevails in the forms of the nominative and accusative cases but in other cases it is used occasionally. In the exploratory complex sentence, the connecting word occupies the position of the subject or object of thought. It is determined that the semantic organization of complex sentences of the clarifying type in the M. Stelmakh’s linguistics is due to the semantics of the basic verb-predicate, indicating the internal state of the person, the expression of will, the induction to action, speech, thinking, perception, and feeling. The research of the structural-semantic organization of complex sentences of the clarifying type made it possible to establish that the writer uses an unsemantic conjunction “that” often, “in order to” is used less. The semantic specificity of the clarifying complex syntactic units is the functioning of the supporting predicate verbs in them in the designation of thinking, the internal state of the person, introducing into the text the elements of psychology, predetermine greater informative saturation. The supporting words to the notation of speech, the expression of will, and the inducement to action are revealed to a lesser extent. Their use made possible the formaсинтаксична одиницяскладнопідрядне речення зі з’ясувальною підрядною частиноюпредикативна частинадієслівний предикатмова художньої літературиіндивідуальний стильсинтаксическая единицасложноподчиненное предложение с изъяснительной подчинительной связьюпредикативная частьглагольный предикатязык художественной литературыиндивидуальный стильsyntactic unita complex sentence with an exploratory subordera predicative parta verb predicatea language of fictionan individual styleArticle