Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorЛіва, Н. В.
dc.contributor.authorЛевая, Н. В.
dc.contributor.authorLiva, N. V.
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-21T12:04:52Z
dc.date.available2017-09-21T12:04:52Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationЛіва Н. В. Феномен тональності у контексті взаємопроникнення засобів виразності європейської музики та живопису: ХІХ–ХХ століття / Н. В. Ліва // Культура і сучасність : альманах. – Київ : Міленіум, 2013. – № 2. – С. 115–122uk_UA
dc.identifier.otherУДК 78.03 "18-19": 008: 301
dc.identifier.urihttp://93.183.203.244:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1160
dc.descriptionМистецтво. Музика. Живопис. Європаuk_UA
dc.description.abstractУ статті розглядається формування поняття тональності й тональної семантики як результат по-ступового тривалого процесу взаємопроникнення засобів виразності у європейській музиці та живопису ХІХ–ХХ століть, а також послідовно простежується еволюція співвідношення «колір – звук» у творах музичного мистецтва та живопису і поступове поглиблення зв’язків між ними. Автор доходить висновку, що однією з кульмінаційних точок даного синтетичного процесу стало формування поняття тональності як амбівалентного для музики й живопису.uk_UA
dc.description.abstractВ статье рассматривается формирование понятия тональности и тональной семантики как ре-зультат постепенного длительного процесса взаимопроникновения средств выразительности в европейской музыке и живописи ХІХ–ХХ веков, а также последовательно прослеживается эволюция соотношения «цвет – звук» в произведениях музыкального искусства и живописи и постепенное углубление связей между ними. Автор приходит к выводу, что одной из кульминационных точек данного синтетического процесса стало формирование понятия тональности как амбивалентного для музыки и живописи.ru
dc.description.abstractCentral place in the article occupies phenomenon of tonality and tonal semantics as a result of a long and gradual process of specific interchange in the sphere of expressive means in European music and painting of the 19–20th centuries. The article contains examples from the history of European music and painting which represent different ways of correlation between colors and sounds and shows gradual deepening of their intercommunication. Sound and color – basic expressive means of music and painting – are things of great difference. Sound is comparatively more active. Historically it is a signal for us that warns, puts us on our guard, and compels to act. In subconscious perception of people music is always the art of action. Color has more static character. In spite of this difference a certain concealed tie exists between the two phenom-ena. This secret connection makes explorers find variants of their synthesis. Musical composition always has visual potential. In particular it finds its way in widespread manner to “decorate” description of music with terms and expressions from painting sphere. Contrary tendencies take place, too: certain specifically musical terms are at use in painting. And, at last, the third category exits which includes those terms and expressions which are equally useful both for music and painting. For the author’s opinion, tonality as an ambivalent term belongs to this third category. In the stream of European music and painting’s development we can watch different forms of sound and color connection. For example in 16th century Italian artist Giuseppe Arcimboldo (1527–593) invented so called “color harpsichord”. That was device maid for the purpose of optimum concordance of music and painting. Sounds of this “color harpsichord” corresponded to concrete color on the special color scale. In the age of Enlightenment a French monk Louis Bertrand Castel (1688–1757) invented similar device. His “color clavicorn” had been planned as an instrument with the help of which deaf people could feel music and “see” musical sound in color. But this invention could not provoke great enthusi-asm because of its main defect: people considered that composition of the color scale was subject of individual business. The article shows how tonal semantics gradually formed. Important role in this long process have played baroque and romantic epochs. Thus, baroque epoch had its own tonal semantics. For exam-ple, D major and A major symbolized joy. J. S. Bach used them in his hymnal “Cum sancto spiritu”, solemn “Et resurrexit”, radiant “Sanctus”. Tonality of the High mass, h minor associated with black color and had tragic character. E minor had been considered as “dark” tonality, too. In these tonalities were composed such parts of the High mass as “Kyrie eleison”, “Qui tollis”, “Crusifixus”. However, ba-roque epoch gives several semantic variants of the same tonality. For example, h minor compositions, written for the flute-traverso, sounded softly and brilliantly. Differences in the interpretation depended of the instruments for which musical composition was written. Romantic epoch can be considered as the age when tonality was comprehended as a bearer of concrete semantics. The word “tonality” can be no more specifically musical term. It begins to acquire sense of color in painting. In romantic epoch comes also complete comprehending of color hearing as a really existing phenomenon. Next “explosion” of music and color alliance was musical impressionism which is practically echo of impressionism in painting. “Palette” of sounds and tonalities corresponded combinations of colors, actual for artists. In the course of time these synthetic tendencies only intensify. Retracing evolution of sound and color correlation, it’s necessary to pay attention on the next appropriateness: we can feel the tie between sound and color not in the process of their immediate per-ception, but only on the mediated level of impressions and moods. Processes of the same nature we can watch in the level of musical and paint image. The article also contains examples that include results non-musical explorations such as neuro-physiologic and psychological experiments. Thus, considerable attention has been paid to the researches of tonal semantics made by Mykola Jukhnovsky who worked in the State pedagogical university in Vinnitsa and investigated peculiarities of physiologic influence of tonality on human organism. In gen-eral different interpretations of tonal semantics have been divided by the author in two groups – so called physiologic and associative conceptions. To the first group (physiologic) belong those which re-gard tonal semantics as absolute quantity. The second group considers constant sense of tonality as a product of subjective impression which depends of individual peculiarities of concrete person. Tonality has been considered in the article as a term which functions with equal intensiveness both in music and painting spheres and has similar meaning. The Author interprets phenomenon of to-nality in music as an analogue of color in painting.en
dc.publisherКиїв : Міленіумuk_UA
dc.subjectтональністьuk_UA
dc.subjectсемантикаuk_UA
dc.subjectсинестезіяuk_UA
dc.subjectкольоровий слухuk_UA
dc.subjectколоритuk_UA
dc.subjectтональностьuk_UA
dc.subjectсемантикаuk_UA
dc.subjectсинестезияuk_UA
dc.subjectцветной слухuk_UA
dc.subjectколоритuk_UA
dc.subjecttonalityuk_UA
dc.subjectsemanticsuk_UA
dc.subjectcolor hearinguk_UA
dc.subjectsynesthesiauk_UA
dc.titleФеномен тональності у контексті взаємопроникнення засобів виразності європейської музики та живопису: ХІХ–ХХ століттяuk_UA
dc.title.alternativeФеномен тональности в контексте взаимопроникновения средств вырази-тельности европейской музыки и живописи (ХІХ–ХХ ст.)uk_UA
dc.title.alternativePhenomenon of tonality in the context of interchange in the sphere of expressive means in European music and painting of the 19-20th centuriesuk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record